Industries · Aerospace & sovereign programmes

Aerospace & sovereign programmes

Written for
Aerodynamics and mission-engineering groups; national quantum programmes that own a 5 to 25-qubit machine.
The decision
When quantum CFD pays off; what to run on the installed machine now; how to schedule traffic, gates and missions.
How it is done today
Programmes wait for methods that need a hundred qubits; traffic and gates are scheduled with classical tools.
When it goes wrong A machine that is installed and idle; a CFD budget with no date on it.

Applications

ApplicationYou giveYou getStatus
CFD acceleration roadmap
Proof Crossover at about 93 logical qubits
A flow problemThe crossover point and the route to itRoadmap
Air traffic flow management and multi-aircraft routingFlights, sectors and constraintsThe flow planDeployed through the platform network
Airline gate allocation and mission schedulingFlights, gates and turnaroundsThe allocationDeployed through the platform network
Satellite placement and launch-vehicle trajectoryThe field problemThe solve, with the cost of the best classical route beside itMapped
Device characterisation for the installed machine
Proof Clock to 0.0029%; the lossy qubit located and routed around at submit
The machine’s calibration exportIts clock, the lossy qubit, and what it can run this quarterLive on quantum hardware
Materials for airframes and propulsion
Proof Materials lane: four of four formulations ranked correctly on IBM Heron
Candidate materialsA ranking with the smallest difference it resolvesLive on quantum hardware
What changes for you
  • Circuits that run on the machine already installed: 42 working units on a 256-atom machine, coupling set by placement.
  • Heavy compute inside the perimeter, with UAE residency.
  • A dated answer on CFD instead of an open-ended one.
First engagement
You send Your machine’s calibration export.
You get back Its characterisation and what it can run this quarter. Two weeks.

Proof · CFD acceleration roadmap · on-premise quantum

Roadmap
~93 logical qubits
the projected crossover for the flow solver, from a measured cost law; the same circuits run at fixed depth on 5–25-qubit national machines today
Baseline The measured cost law of the classical solver; the installed machine’s size
Platform A forward projection; the circuits measured on seven quantum platforms
Decision
When quantum CFD pays off, and what runs on the installed machine today
What is modelled
The cost of the flow-transport solver against its classical equivalent, as a measured scaling law.
Operational outcome
  • A dated crossover for quantum CFD
  • Fixed circuit depth of three entangling layers from 5 to 156 qubits
  • Runs on the 5–25-qubit machine a national programme already owns

Problem size 5–156 qubits · 7 quantum platforms · heavy compute inside the customer perimeter · Scope A projection; no CFD advantage on present hardware is claimed.

Benchmark

Published reference Most application methods need about 100 physical qubits before returning anything; national programmes own 5–25-qubit machines. published resource requirements across the application layer
Merlin Fixed-depth circuits on the installed machine · crossover projected at ~93 logical qubits
Baseline The measured cost law; the installed machine’s size

Further results in this industry

Case studies

Mobility · aerospacePrediction
A flow-transport solver mapped to the logical-qubit scale at which we will test it against the classical solver, running today across seven hardware platforms. No advantage on present hardware is claimed.

Other industries

Semiconductors & advanced materials · Energy & utilities · Chemicals & process manufacturing · Mobility & automotive · Telecom · Pharma & life sciences · Finance · Security & critical infrastructure